They Knew They Had Nothing — And Kicked Down the Door Anyway

They Knew They Had Nothing — And Kicked Down the Door Anyway

Two hundred and seven pages. That’s how many pages of internal FBI documents it took to confirm what half the country already knew: the FBI didn’t believe it had probable cause to raid Mar-a-Lago. They said so themselves. In writing. In emails to each other. While they were loading the van.

You can’t make this stuff up. Actually, you don’t have to — Judicial Watch just made them hand it over.

Here’s what the documents show. On July 13, 2022 — less than a month before agents showed up at Donald Trump’s home with guns and a warrant — the FBI’s own Washington Field Office sent an internal email that read: “WFO does not believe…that we have established probable cause for the search warrant at Mar a Lago.”

Not “we’re getting closer.” Not “we have concerns but probable cause exists.” They flat-out said they didn’t have it.

The agents recommended cooperating with Trump’s attorney Evan Corcoran instead. They called five weeks of deliberation on probable cause “counterproductive.” They described their own evidence as “single source, has not been corroborated, and may be dated.” One frustrated agent wrote: “We haven’t generated any new facts, but keep being given draft after draft after draft.”

Draft after draft. The DOJ kept sending the FBI new versions of probable cause — like a college kid rewriting a term paper until the professor gives in. The facts didn’t change. The drafts did. Eventually someone at DOJ’s Criminal and Enforcement Section signed off, overruling the field agents who actually investigated the case.

Then-Deputy Assistant Attorney General George Toscas — the same man who oversaw the Hillary Clinton email investigation that went absolutely nowhere — reportedly said he “frankly doesn’t give a damn about the optics.” George Toscas doesn’t give a damn about the optics of sending armed agents to raid a former president’s home over a document dispute. The same George Toscas who watched Hillary Clinton delete 30,000 subpoenaed emails and decided that wasn’t worth a search warrant. That George Toscas.

The operation was codenamed “Plasmic Echo.” Which sounds like a rejected Bon Jovi album but was actually the counterintelligence investigation into a former president whose biggest crime was winning an election the wrong people didn’t want him to win.

And here’s the detail that makes the whole thing go from infuriating to obscene: the FBI’s Operations Order authorized deadly force. Deadly force. For a paperwork dispute they didn’t even believe they had probable cause to investigate. If a member of the Trump family had answered the door wrong, agents were authorized to shoot. Over boxes that the National Archives could have retrieved with a moving truck and a polite phone call.

Think about what this means for a second. We now have documentary proof — not speculation, not cable news opinion, actual government documents obtained through FOIA — that the FBI’s own field agents believed the legal standard for the search had not been met. The DOJ overruled them. The raid went forward. And then the same DOJ appointed a special counsel to prosecute the man they raided without probable cause.

They built the prosecution on top of a raid they knew was legally deficient. That’s not law enforcement. That’s a political operation wearing a badge.

Every FBI agent who sent those emails knew exactly what was happening. They put their objections in writing because they wanted a paper trail — the same instinct that keeps bureaucrats employed when the music stops. They knew this would come out eventually. They just didn’t think it would matter.

It matters now. Tom Fitton at Judicial Watch called it “a historic abuse of power,” which is the polite way of saying the Biden DOJ used federal law enforcement as a political weapon against the sitting frontrunner for the 2024 Republican nomination. The FBI was the gun. The DOJ pulled the trigger. And 207 pages of their own paperwork just proved they knew the safety was off and the target was innocent.

Remember this the next time someone lectures you about “no one is above the law.” They’re right. No one is above the law — including the people who are supposed to enforce it.


Most Popular

Most Popular